imageI know two women whose lives have been shattered by ME, and I can tell you their suffering was very real, and not “all in their minds”, as some might believe.

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, or chronic fatigue syndrome, affects an estimated 250,000 people in the UK. I’m highlighting it today following a significant legal victory for two ME sufferers after a leading judge declared it was “in the public interestâ€? for the High Court to rule on claims that treatments being offered on the NHS are “potentially fatalâ€?.

Kevin Short, a university graduate from Norfolk, and Douglas Fraser, of London, a former professional concert violinist with the Scottish Philharmonic Orchestra, have both had their careers curtailed by the condition’s crippling effects. Both men were outraged when, last August, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ME.

They say that, in its guidelines, NICE refused to classify ME as “a disease of the nervous systemâ€?, as the World Health Organisation has done, and recommended treatments which they argue are “harmful to patients” or could even prove fatal.
Mr Fraser and Mr Short took their fight to have NICE’s decision overturned to London’s High Court.

Barrister Jeremy Hyam, for the two men, explained that NICE guidelines recommended that ME sufferers be treated with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) in an effort to alleviate their symptoms, yet one sufferer collapsed and died coming out of a gym after taking part in the GET programme.

Mr Hyam argued NICE had failed to take into account any evidence apart from that unearthed by its controlled clinical trials, which he said were not extensive enough. NICE had made its recommendations “based on inadequate evidence” and “failed to apply rational and consistent diagnostic criteria”,

Mr Justice Cranston expressed doubt over whether it was the court’s place to rule on medical or scientific matters, but was in the end persuaded that legal issues of “great public importance” were at stake. Giving his judgement, and granting permission to seek judicial review, the judge said:

“There is no doubt that, as with any debilitating condition that a person may suffer, many of us will know someone, or be connected to someone who has ME or chronic fatigue syndrome. It is a serious condition and the two appellants in this case have suffered a great deal as a result of it.

“Given that there is this obvious clash between the bio-medical and the psychosomatic theories of the cause of this condition and the great public interest therein, it seems to me that this case ought to go forward to a full hearing.”

The case will now go ahead to a full High Court hearing at a date yet to be fixed.

A letter in today’s Eastern Daily Press from ME sufferer Linda Crowhurst said this ruling gave hope to all those afflicted by this devastating condition. She writes:

“I am severely affected and my ME needs go completely unmet in Norfolk. Luckily, I have a very supportive GP, who knows that my condition is neurological, but his hands are tied when it comes to referring me to consultants because there is not the interest, the knowledge, the understanding or the availability of biomedical clinicians to treat me. I am left with virtually nothing, no hope and, worse, no biomedical understanding to ease the pain, the numbness, the digestive, the autonomic and endocrine issues: the 50 plus symptoms that I have endured.

“I want to be able to access services in Norfolk as any other person with a chronic illness is able to do.”

Let’s hope this ruling will pave the way for more research into this terrible, debilitating illness.