South African MP George Lekgetho has called for prostitution to
be legalised during the football World Cup to be held there in 2010. He believes it would help cut incidences of rape and would bring in taxes to fight poverty.
But my CHASTE colleague Carol Freeman suggests a different perspective and argues why this is not the answer:
Last week, George Lekgetho, when arguing for the legalisation of prostitution for the 2010 World Cup, said: “It is one of the things that would make it [the tournament] a success because we hear of many rapes, because people don’t have access to them [women].� Statements like this one confirm all my worst fears about the position of women abuse and myths about rape in South Africa.
The premises here are firstly that men are incapable of controlling their sexual urges; secondly, that if such urges go unsatisfied, men will resort to rape; and thirdly, that it is up to the government to provide enabling legislation for these uncontrollable sexual desires — all are deeply disturbing!
Many men throughout the world experience extended periods of celibacy without using prostitutes, or indeed resorting to rape. The commonly perpetuated myth that a man’s sexuality is somehow more urgent and savage than a woman’s should be deeply offensive to men. Many men and women throughout all ethnic groups and cultures choose to exercise their sexuality only in committed, loving relationships; or, at the very least, with another consenting adult. There should be no place for this myth to continue in a society which strives to promote the value of equality.
Men rape for many reasons, including a desire to exert power in response to a feeling of entitlement, or perhaps to fulfil a need to humiliate and oppress their victims to compensate for their own perceived inadequacy. These men are rapists, and as diverse and as complex as the reasons for their behaviour may be, it is by no means excusable and should never be tolerated. The idea that men in general are capable of rape if their carnal desires cannot be satisfied elsewhere is preposterous, and profoundly insulting.
It is dangerous to perpetuate the myth that all men will forcefully and violently take from a woman “sexual gratification� when they can find no one to give it willingly, as this implies that any man would be willing to rape — this simply is not true. Most men have a profound respect for women, and would never assault anyone in this most violent and intrusive way. Men who rape do not do it for sexual gratification, and they should be removed from society.
Finally, even if George Lekgetho’s thoroughly misguided belief were true, when did it become the government’s responsibility to legislate in order to accommodate this most anti-social behaviour? Women who work in the sex industry already suffer a higher number of assaults and rapes than any other group. With the exception of relatively few “high class� call girls and massage-parlour sex workers, women in this industry tend to be desperate and thoroughly exploited. Their situation may be such that they have no choice but to sell their bodies in order to feed their families. Such women are vulnerable enough without sending men to them who now believe that they have a government-endorsed right to sex. Regulation would not protect these women, as they are exactly the kind of people sought by such predators.
It is to South Africa’s credit that it has been chosen to host this most prestigious tournament. This does mean, however, that the eyes of the world will be scrutinising our young democracy. When comments like these are reported internationally they paint a bleak picture of men, women and sexuality in the South African context. With rape and violence against women at catastrophic levels, ideologies like Mr Lekgetho’s cannot go unquestioned. I sincerely hope that the 2010 World Cup does not focus on providing sexual experiences for men at the expense of being a successful sporting tournament, one of which all South Africans can be proud.
*During the last World Cup in Germany in 2006, experience shows that trafficking increased because at every big sporting event where a large number of men gather, there is a spectacular rise in the demand for sexual services.
Women’s organisations feared that many innocent women may have been tricked into arriving in Germany with deceptive job offers and then found themselves defenceless and vulnerable in a country they did not know. This is Anna’s story, a 20-year-old Bulgarian, forced into sex slavery, which was highlighted during the World Cup in Germany.
I would like to see South African MPs show more commitment to fighting AIDs and corruption instead, and protect women from being placed at potential risk.
Rape is a cop out, as is the need to bok the moment you see a woman. Men who have grown up [excluding the majority of us] can control it.
Like fish.
What a gross idea! The whole subject depresses me and I am ashamed that the female editor of The Sun has no qualms about page 3 girls.
What a grim choice – perhaps they could trial Sharia law over there; isn’t that where you loose the offending body part in respect of a crime, you know – hand chopped off for a thief etc…..? Or is that Arab law? Yes I think it might be; Sharia law is if the woman gets raped it’s her fault unless she can get half a dozen men to say otherwise.
Arab law? Has it’s appeal doesn’t it?!
I can’t believe that an MP actually suggested this. Will rape actually increase because of the World Cup? What does that say about the police service? Hmm, his comment has opened up a lot of questions.
I’m not necessarily agreeing with him, but if, “He believes it would help cut incidences of rape and would bring in taxes to fight poverty.” why call for prostitution to be legalised just for the world cup? Why not call for legalisation – period.
Are there really people like this?
What a preposterous suggestion. I agree with all that Carol says.
Quote: “when did it become the government’s responsibility to legislate in order to accommodate this most anti-social behaviour?”
Terrifying…how low do we stoop to ensure our Games are a commercial ‘success’?
It makes sense that there will be higher incidences of violence of all kinds at a large football tournaments. Football is after all a sport of the criminal classes. Tribalism dominates the mind of the football supporter as soon as he dons his shirt and scarf. Reasonable and polite men become primeval thugs in the blink of an eye. There probably will be more rapes during the 2010 World Cup, and muggings, and stabbings, and murders.
As for legalising prostitution I think it makes sense.
Bloody hell,
can afford a world cup ticket and a prostitute
modern football hooligans must be earning more than minimum wage
I guess supporters of the winning team will be after a victory shag
and supporters of the losing teams, after a consolation shag
Sounds like a win-win for the prossies
The same proposal came up pertaining to the 2010 Olympics in Vancouver, but the federal government said no chance is that going to happen. Prostitution will always exist, but why can’t we get the pimps and scumbags and white slavers away from it? Because our hypocritical overlords say no.
Oh yes, men acting like barbarians are just being “human.” If they don’t have their whores (cheap enough for even the poorest to afford no less), they’ll just go around raping instead, and then how could we blame them? Poor men.
If anybody is interested in reading a working girl’s blog, you can check out mine.