Michael Grade wore them with his dark suit yesterday, Sir Christopher Meyer (pic) is famed for them, and even David Gest wouldn’t  be without them in the jungle. But can someone please tell me, why do men wear red socks?

One one hand they look naff and tasteless, the kind of accessory I would expect John McCririck to have a drawer full of. But they also have a quirky appeal indicating a “devil may care” attitude. Are they  simply a ploy of the upper-class dandy?

I wonder if our continental men could wear them with panache, while on a Brit, the site of the red ankle causes ripples of mirth and derision.

Sir Christopher‘s hosiery has caused much speculation from commentators seeking  an explanation for his outlandish taste, it has even had Michael Gove in despair. The reason seems to be a tactic to be unforgettable:

“He wears red socks (a 1980s sort of idiosyncratic gesture designed to keep him in the memory of those he meets, but nevertheless one that works), he can ride in the ambassadorial Rolls-Royce through Washington like a pasha, but he is essentially grounded, partly through his wife Catherine – despite them being known as Fred and Ginger on the Washington circuit.”

And I’m sure it is a case of “once seen never forgotten” as Sir Christopher even wears a matching tie! But before you head off to try out this daring style for yourself, do take advice from the Men’s Style Guru who advises you not to wear red socks while giving the State of the Union address as “some will take you for a Communist and others will insist that the vice president take over immediately, on the ‘unable to perform’ clause.”

So men, have you added a pair of red socks to your Christmas list, or wouldn’t you be seen dead in them?