Businesses are seemingly coughing up thousands of pounds to chat with Ministers at next week’s Labour Party conference. Had it been Conservatives, we would have been accused of sleaze and greed.
If our leading politicians have their fingers on the pulse, surely they should want to meet as many people as possible from different backgrounds and exchange views. What about others who want to rub shoulders with Lord Falconer too, talk to him about the laws of the land, but cannot afford to pay?
Businesses are obviously hoping to benefit from these chats, that they will open the door to further introductions.
I believe this might be the thin edge of the wedge, that Labour will next be planning corporate receptions and tours of Westminster – at a fee.
At the end of the day, Ministers are still elected representatives, why not invite a few constituents to share their eggs and bacon as well? They might find they prefer it.
Update from Dr Crippen: I wonder if Patricia Hewitt would like to invite this nurse to have breakfast with her..
I think the question is not whether it’s happening or even how far it goes, but what exactly these businesses manage to get in return. They’re obviously trying to put themselves in line for some nice cosy government contracts. So perhaps it would be beneficial if we Conservatives were to take note of which companies are willing to cough up (anyone willing to go spy?) and then to take note of just what contracts they get awarded in the future. Could be a very handy guidebook on Labour nepotism if they win the next election!
I’m sure these businesses will be handing over their cards and pushing for inside info favouritism for new contracts. This would be a small charge indeed for what they could get out of it, it’s hardly a level playing field. Like you, I hope it will be followed closely.
Yes I think there needs to be a close eye kept on this and I would hope that a blogger or two out there can do this for us.
I’d like to know where the money is going. As these are elected servants of the public at large surely whatever they are spending their time discussing is on behalf of the people, therefore the people are surely entitled to at least know where the money is going. Am I wrong on this?
Mike, Yes, Government needs to be much more accountable and transparent. I would like to know which businesses benefit as a result, it could be the best £1,500 spent for some.
It’s amazing how a £30m debt can clarify the mind…..